Indexing metadata

Unemployment, recognition and meritocracy

Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
1. Title Title of document Unemployment, recognition and meritocracy
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Gottfried Schweiger; University of Salzburg; Austria
3. Subject Discipline(s) Political Philosophy
3. Subject Keyword(s) recognition, unemployment, meritocracy, social critique, Alex Honneth
4. Description Abstract Unemployment is one of the greatest social problems all around the world including in modern capitalistic welfare states. Therefore its social critique is a necessary task for any critical social philosophy such as Axel Honneth's recognition approach, which understands social justice in terms of social conditions of recognition. This paper aims to develop an evaluation of unemployment and its moral weight from this perspective. I will lay out the recognition approach and present a moral evaluation of unemployment as socially unjust based on the knowledge of its negative consequences for those affected. I will then discuss two objections to this conclusion, namely that a mere correlation of suffering and moral wrongness is not enough and that there are legitimate differences in the experience of recognition which could justify the existence of unemployment as deserved. In the next section, I will then refute both objections and first show that unemployment can be understood as socially unjust based on the knowledge that it is involuntary and that the unemployed are not responsible for their condition. Then I will discuss the relationship between the idea of meritocracy and unemployment to examine the assumption of unemployment as being deserved. I will finally conclude that unemployment is not a necessary side effect of meritocracy and that there are good reasons to argue for a moral and justified obligation to provide an actual access to paid work for all who want to work. However, such changes face serious obstacles and are not likely to happen under the current interpretation of meritocracy and social esteem which are one-sided and flawed.

5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Universidad Complutense de Madrid
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2014-07-12
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
8. Type Type
9. Format File format PDF
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy; Vol 3, No 4 (2014): January-June
12. Language English=en en
13. Relation Supp. Files
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
15. Rights Copyright and permissions Copyright (c) 2014 Gottfried Schweiger
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.