Home > Vol 6, No 10 (2017): 241-270 > Ponce Santos

The Role of The Will in Hannah Arendt’s Theory on Political Conflicts

Rodrigo Ponce Santos

Abstract


Hannah Arendt’s work is notably ambiguous in handling the concept of will. On the one hand, willing appears as an anti-political faculty; on the other, it is named as the spring of political action. This paper asks what does this shift mean to her political theory —hoping that it could also help us to think our current political conflicts. The main argument is that will’s consistency with the plurality of public-political life becomes intelligible only if we have in mind its contentious feature as well as its bonding role among the several faculties that compose a multiple self. However, the anti-political notion of the will as a command that imposes itself as a sovereign decision seems hard to avoid. I conclude by suggesting that Arendt’s reappraisal removes its arbitrary and violent character by means of what she calls the transformation of will into love.

Keywords


Will; Sovereignty; Conflict; Love.

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Arendt, H. (1966). Basic Moral Propositions – lectures – University of Chicago. In Hannah Arendt Papers, Series: Subject File, 1949-1975. Washington, D.C, United States of America: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress.

Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the republic. New York, United States of America: Harvest.

Arendt, H. (1978). The life of the mind. New York, United States of America: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Arendt, H. (1985). The origins of totalitarianism. New York, United States of America: Harvest. (Originally published in 1951).

Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Chicago, United States of America: The University of Chicago. (Originally published in 1958). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001

Arendt, H. (2005). Essays in understanding 1930 – 1954: Formation, exile, and totalitarianism. New York, United States of America: Schocken.

Arendt, H. (2006). Between past and future. New York, United States of America: Penguin. (Originally published in 1961).

Assy, B. (2002). A atividade da vontade em Hannah Arendt: por um êthos da singularidade (haecceitas) e da ação. In A. Correia (Ed.), Transpondo o abismo – Hannah Arendt entre a filosofia e a política (pp. 32-54). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Forense Universitária.

Duarte, A. (2013). Hannah Arendt e o pensamento político: A arte de distinguir e relacionar conceitos. Argumentos: Revista de Filosofia, 1, 39-63. Retrieved from http://www.dvprppg.ufc.br/argumentos/index.php/argumentos/article/view/3

Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2005). Multidão: Guerra e democracia na era do império [Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire] (C. Marques, Trad.). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Record.

Honig, B. (1988). Arendt, identity, and difference. Political Theory, 16(1), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591788016001005

Honig, B. (1993). Political theory and the displacement of politics. Ithaca, United States of America; London, United Kingdom: Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591793021003010

Honig, B. (2001). Democracy and the foreigner. Princeton, United States of America; Oxford, United Kingdom: Princeton University. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400824816

Honig, B. (2007). Between decision and deliberation: Political paradox in democratic theory. American Political Science Review. 101(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070098

Kalyvas, A. (2004). From the act to the decision: Hannah Arendt and the question of decisionism. Political Theory, 32(3), 320-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704263032

Kalyvas, A. (2008). Democracy and the politics of the extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt. New York, United States of America: Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755842


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Rodrigo Ponce Santos

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Las Torres de Lucca. Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política
ISSN-e 2255-3827

© 2016. Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Biblioteca Complutense | Ediciones Complutense