Home > Vol 8, No 14 (2019): 9-33 > Arrese Igor

Freedom of Speech and Moral Development in John Milton´s Political Thought and Johann Gottlieb Fichte´s Revolutionary Writings


Héctor Oscar Arrese Igor

Abstract

This paper aims to explore conceptual relationships between philosophical developments to support freedom of speech in John Milton´s Areopagitica and Johann Gottlieb Fichte´s Reclamation of the Freedom of Thought. I intend to enhance the philosophical heritance collected and recreated by Fichte. This paper hypothesizes that both theories state that freedom of speech is a condition for the development of morality. In both cases, moral deliberation has a public character, given that moral judgment needs the consideration of different viewpoints about the question at stake. Finally, in both cases, it is defended a republican concept of power, characterized by opposition to moral paternalism, as a form of despotism.

Keywords

Milton, Fichte, Tolerance, Freedom, Revolution

Full Text:

PDF HTML

Statistics

Abstract : 142 vistas. PDF : 25 vistas. HTML : 21 vistas.

References

Berlin, I. (2002). Two concepts of liberty. In I. Berlin, Liberty: Incorporating four essays on liberty. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University.

Bezemek, Ch. (2015). The epistemic neutrality of the “marketplace of ideas”: Milton, Mill, Brandeis, and Holmes on falsehood and freedom of speech. First Amendment Law Review, 14, 159-181.

Blasi, V. (1996). John Milton´s Areopagitica and the modern first amendment. Communications Lawyer. The Journal of Media, Information and Communications, 14(4), 11-19.

Corns, Th. N. (1995). Milton and the characteristics of a free commonwealth. In Q. Skinner, D. Armitage, D. and A. Himy, A. (Eds.). Milton and republicanism (pp. 25-42). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University.

Cox, R. (2007). John Milton´s politics, republicanism and the terms of liberty. Literature Compass, 4(6), 1561-1576. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-4113.2007.00494.x

Dzelzainis, M. (1995). Milton´s classical republicanism. In Q. Skinner, D. Armitage and A. Himy (Eds.), Milton and republicanism (pp. 3-24). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University.

Fichte, J. G. (1971). Zurückforferung der Denkfreiheit von den Fürsten Europens, die sie bisher unterdrückten [Reclamation of the Freedom of Thought which Has Been Oppressed until Today]. In I. Fichte (Ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Sämmtliche Werke (vol. 6). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. (Original work published in 1793).

Jordan, M. (2001). Milton and modernity. Politics, masculinity and Paradise Lost. New York, United States of America: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kahn, V. (1995). The metaphorical contract in Milton´s ‘Tenure of kings and magistrates’. In Q. Skinner, A. Armitage and A. Himy (Eds.), Milton and Republicanism (pp. 82-105). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University.

Kasa, D. (2016). Arminian theology, Machiavellian republicanism, and cooperative virtue in Milton´s Paradise Lost. Milton Quarterly, 50(4), 260-276. DOI: 10.1111/milt.12189

Kendall, W. (1960). How to read Milton´s Areopagitica. The Journal of Politics, 22(3), 439-473.

Kranidas, Th. (1984). Polarity and structure in Milton´s Areopagitica. English Literary Renaissance, 14(2), 175-190.

Lewalski, B. K. (2007). John Milton. Paradise Lost. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.

Kühn, M. (2012). Fichte. Ein deutscher Philosoph. Munich, Germany: C. H. Beck.

Loewenstein, D. (2004). Milton. Paradise Lost. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University.

Milton, J. (2007). Paradise Regained. In John Milton. Paradise Regained & Samson Agonistes and the Complete Shorter Poems. New York, United States of America: Modern Library. (Original work published in 1671).

Milton J., (2008), Paradise Lost. Oxford, United Kingdom, Oxford University. (Original work published in 1674).

Milton, J. (2014a). Areopagitica. In John Milton. Areopagitica and Other Writings. London, United Kingdom: Penguin Group. (Original work published in 1644).

Milton, J. (2014b). The tenure of kings and magistrates. In John Milton. Areopagitica and other writings. London, United Kingdom: Penguin Group. (Original work published in 1649).

Olofson Thickstun, M. (2007). Milton´s Paradise Lost. Moral Education. New York, United States of America: Palgrave Macmillan.

Orgel, S. and Goldberg, J. (2008). Introduction. In John Milton. Paradise lost. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University.

Pujals, E. (2017). Milton y El paraíso perdido [Milton and Paradise lost]. In John Milton. El paraíso perdido. Madrid, Spain: Cátedra.

Reisner, N. (2011). John Milton´s Paradise lost. A reading guide. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Edinburgh University.

Renaut, A. (1986). Le Système de Droit. Philosophie et droit dans la pensée de Fichte [The System of Right. Philosophy and Right in Fichte´s Thought]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.

Skinner, Q. (2004). John Milton and the politics of slavery. In Q. Skinner, Vision of politics. Vol. 2: Renaissance virtues (pp. 286-307). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University.

Walker, W. (2011). Antiformalism, antimonarquism and republicanism in Milton´s ‘Regicide tracts’. Modern Philology, 108(4), 507-537.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Hector Oscar Arrese Igor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Las Torres de Lucca. Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política © 2018.
ISSN-e 2255-3827